top of page
Search

Miranda Priestly: A Complex Portrait of Power, Perfectionism, and the High Stakes of Leadership

Updated: Feb 10



Two women are engaged in a conversation in an office setting. One woman is standing by a table, leaning against it, while the other is seated, holding a clipboard. The room is decorated with framed pictures, a mirror, and various office items such as a lamp, flowers, and a phone.

The character of Miranda Priestly from "The Devil Wears Prada" is often described as a "jerk" or similarly negative terms largely due to her demanding, harsh, and sometimes seemingly unreasonable expectations of her employees. This portrayal taps into a common narrative trope where a powerful, successful figure in a highly competitive industry is depicted as being difficult or tyrannical, perhaps as a reflection or exaggeration of real-world experiences in such high-pressure environments. Miranda's character embodies the extremes of perfectionism and dedication to her career, which, while showcasing her competence and passion, also highlights a lack of empathy and warmth in her interactions with her staff.

Regarding the interview scene with Andy Sachs, played by Anne Hathaway, your analysis touches on an important aspect of the story's dynamic. Andy comes into the interview unprepared, with little knowledge about the magazine or the fashion industry, and seemingly indifferent to the job's prestige and the work involved. This sets up a classic underdog story where the protagonist is initially out of their depth but grows through challenges.

In real-life job scenarios, being unprepared for an interview, especially for a highly coveted position in a specialized field, would typically be a critical misstep. Candidates are generally expected to research the company, understand the role they're applying for, and demonstrate a genuine interest in the position. However, "The Devil Wears Prada" uses Andy's lack of preparation and interest as a plot device to highlight her outsider status in the fashion world and to set the stage for her character development.

The decision to hire someone like Andy in real life would depend on various factors, including the specific needs of the company, the role, and perhaps a perceived potential that the hiring manager sees in the candidate beyond their current lack of interest or preparation. In highly competitive fields, though, it's more likely that a candidate who shows both passion for the job and preparedness would be favored.

Miranda's characterization as a "jerk" serves a narrative purpose by creating tension and setting high stakes for Andy's journey, but it also invites viewers to question the standards of success and leadership, and how these are portrayed in relation to gender, power, and work ethic. The film, while entertaining, opens up discussions about workplace dynamics, the value of mentorship, and the personal costs of professional success.

 
 
 

コメント


bottom of page